Reader Comments

Meridian Health Protocol

by Regina Fancy (2020-02-26)

Another important step in medical Meridian Health Protocol Review records management was the development of the Health Evaluation through Logical Processing (HELP) system in the late 1960s. This integrated hospital information system provided decision support for health professionals and demonstrated that computer systems could not only replace paper records, but also improve the process of care by enhancing the use of records.In 1991, the Institute of Medicine published The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. This seminal document presented blueprints for the future of computer-based patient records (CPR). In the 1997 revised version, an expert committee explored the potential of CPRs to improve decisions about diagnosis and care, provided database for policy making, and attempted to answer these questions:Who uses patient records? - What technology is available and what further research is necessary to meet users' needs? - What should government, medical organizations, and others do to make the transition to CPRs?In 2003, the Quality of Health Care in America Committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) filed a report titled Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard of Care. In it, the IOM encouraged hospitals and physicians to adopt EMRs as a major step toward preventing medical errors.To better understand the role and importance of EMRs in improving health care To encourage government actions that could maximize the benefits of EMRs and increase their useThe RAND study estimated the potential savings, costs, and health and safety benefits of EMRs if adopted widely and used effectively. Some of the key findings of the study included:Health Information Technology would save money and significantly improve healthcare quality. - The annual savings from efficiency alone could exceed $77 billion. - Health and safety benefits could double the savings while reducing illness and prolonging life. - Obstacles to adoption of EMRs include market disincentives because in general, those who pay for Health Information Technology do not receive the related savings.